Categories: News
Related Articles
Briefing – Understanding delegated and implementing acts – 07-07-2021
Law-making by the executive is a phenomenon that exists not only in the European Union (EU) but also in its Member States, as well as in other Western liberal democracies. Many national legal systems differentiate between delegated legislation − adopted by the executive and having the same legal force as parliamentary legislation − and purely executive acts −aimed at implementing parliamentary legislation, but that may neither supplement nor modify it. In the EU, the distinction between delegated acts and implementing acts was introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon. The distinction, laid down in Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), seems clear only at first sight. Delegated acts are defined as non-legislative acts of general application, adopted by the European Commission on the basis of a delegation contained in a legislative act. They may supplement or amend the basic act, but only as to non-essential aspects of the policy area. In contrast, implementing acts are not defined as to their legal nature, but to their purpose − where uniform conditions for implementing legally binding Union acts are needed. Under no circumstances may an implementing act modify anything in the basic act. Delegated acts differ from implementing acts in particular with regard to the procedural aspects of their adoption − the former after consulting Member States’ experts, but their view is not binding; the latter in the comitology procedure, where experts designated by the Member States, sitting on specialised committees, can object to a draft implementing act. In the case of delegated acts, however, the Parliament and Council can introduce, in the delegation itself, a right to object to a draft act or even to revoke the delegation altogether. Both delegated and implementing acts are subject to judicial review by the Court of Justice of the EU which controls their conformity with the basic act.
Source : © European Union, 2021 – EP
LEAK: What NATO allies will decide in Brussels
NATO leaders will gather in Brussels for a summit on Monday (14 June) to re-orient the alliance after its identity crisis over the past years. The meeting is sandwiched between the G7 summit in Britain and an EU–US summit. The…
German Climate Protection Act: Gas is the answer [Promoted content]
In a ground-breaking ruling, the German Federal Constitutional Court calls for amendments in the German Climate Protection Act. Now the ball is in the government’s court. A technology-neutral approach to energy and gas can help it deliver.
Austria’s Green-ÖVP coalition showing cracks after finance minister ignores court order
Austria’s constitutional court has urged Finance Minister Gernot Blümel to deliver crucial documents to the investigation committee set up in the wake of the “Ibiza-gate” scandal and tasked with investigating political corruption in the former Austrian government. The court has…
Highlights – Financial contributions from non-EU countries: committee debate – Committee on Budgets – Committee on Budgetary Control
The Committees on Budgets and on Budgetary Control will go over the European Court of Auditors’ review on financial contributions from non-EU countries to the EU, with ECA Member François-Roger Cazala, on 12 July. These contributions are based on agreements through which non-EU countries gain access to EU programmes and activities and/or to the EU single market. In 2019, they amounted to EUR 1,9 billion, meaning 1% of the total EU revenue.
BUDG Webpage
CONT Webpage
Meeting agenda and documents
Live streaming
ECA review: Financial contributions from non-EU countries to the EU and Member States
EU Fact Sheets: Budgetary control
EU Fact Sheets: EU financing
CONT Webpage
Meeting agenda and documents
Live streaming
ECA review: Financial contributions from non-EU countries to the EU and Member States
EU Fact Sheets: Budgetary control
EU Fact Sheets: EU financing
Source : © European Union, 2021 – EP
Responses